I call upon You, Lord, God of Abraham and God of Isaac and God of Jacob and Israel, You who are the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, the God who, through the abundance of your mercy, was well-pleased towards us so that we may know You, who made heaven and earth, who rules over all, You who are the one and the true God, above whom there is no other God; You who, by our Lord Jesus Christ gave us the gift of the Holy Spirit, give to every one who reads this writing to know You, that You alone are God, to be strengthened in You, and to avoid every heretical and godless and impious teaching.

St Irenaeus of Lyons, Against the Heresies 3:6:4


Showing posts with label Tradition. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tradition. Show all posts

Friday, December 27, 2013

Why the Need for Creeds - Pt. 3



FACT: Everyone Has a Creed! 

The question is not whether this church or that church has a creed/confession or not. Rather, the real question is this:

“Is this or that church’s creed/confession public or private?”

This is really the only question, because every church, in fact nearly every social group, will have a certain set of core or fundamental convictions and values that bind the members together, and which defines what it means to be a member. Those values and beliefs that unify and have authority over a particular group serve as that groups “constitution” or better “creed/confession.”

Imagine if everyone took their anti-creed attitude to the streets! Imagine further how SCARY it would be if every driver you met on the road had the same attitude, saying,

I’m a free spirit! I’m not going to have any set of so-called “safe driving” conventions and principles determine my driving habits! No! How, when, and at what speed I drive my car is my personal business! “Drive on the right hand side,” they say?!? Ha! I’ll show them; I’ll take my half-out of the middle!  Heck, why should I have to share the road at all?!?

To look at it another way, think about sports. What if at the next Super Bowl, all the team members and coaches got together and decided,

Enough of this smothering “tradition”!! We’ll never be the best players we can be, if we keep playing according to the traditional understanding of what “football” means! If we don’t break loose—in this very game—then the sport will never progress, never move forward.

It’s always been the same! Tradition has forced us into believing that football is “a game played between two teams of 11 players each in which the ball is in possession of one side at a time and is advanced by running or passing.” No more!! Today, we are going on that field and redefining what football means!  We’ll put out all our players...or maybe just five. I say we dribble instead of carry the ball. Boys, if we throw off the old tradition of what football is and means, anything is possible!!!

That right! And, if anything is possible, then nothing is possible. If the driving example were true, no one would have the guts to drive anywhere; it would be like a war zone! What if the football example were the case? One thing is sure, whatever they’d be doing out there, hoping to make football some greater thing, it would no longer be football at all!!!

Thankfully, whether in driving or sports, people don’t try to apply their anti-creed attitude most of the time. And, thankfully, despite their anti-creed slogans, no one pretends to reinvent Christianity or the meaning of the Bible each and every Sunday! That is because everyone has a creed/confession that governs their understanding of what it means to be worshipping as Christians and what the Bible teaches on all the major points of doctrine.

Do anti-creed churches reinvent what Christianity means each Sunday? No! Why not, though?

Because in reality they have a creed; it’s a private creed rather than a public one. But, what’s the problem with a creed being private? There are a couple of real problems with the private creed approach.

(1) If a church’s creed is private, then it can change without notice. This leads to distrust, uncertainty, and confusion in a church.

(2) If a church’s creed is private, then it can never be challenged, because it isn’t explicitly known. 

Whether it is the Apostles’ Creed, which has been around for almost 1700 years, or it’s the Heidelberg Catechism, which has been around for over 450 years, these creeds have had a long career and have served the church through her history. Being some of the most widely known and confessed documents in the world, they have also been scrutinized and picked-over for centuries, and have withstood the challenges of critics, skeptics, and other opponents. So, despite all the challenges our public creeds have suffered, today with the church all around the world, we still confess, “Credo,” “I BELIEVE ...etc.”

Saturday, December 21, 2013

WHY THE NEED FOR CREEDS? Part I



A big part of our culture—in both the world and the church—turns its nose up at the idea of a creed, confession, or any other expression of tradition. In the world, the spirit is one of “progress,” moving into the future without any respect for the past. It’s an un- or anti-history attitude. Similarly, the spirit of our age is anti-authoritarian, throwing off any authority that would try to limit or even influence the individual’s personal views, values, and allegiances.

Sadly, there is a similar spirit in the church today. This anti-creedal and anti-history attitude is expressed in many different ways and through many different sorts of practices. But, it is well summarized by a few popular slogans.
           
            “No creed but Christ!”
            “No book but the Bible!”
            “We serve Truth, not traditions!”

These kinds of statements sound really good, don’t they?!? They almost sound like they fell out of the pages of the Bible. We all want honor Jesus, the Bible, and God’s revealed, inspired Truth as the ultimate authority in faith, life, and doctrine!! As good as it all sounds, though, these sorts of statements are seriously flawed, as are the assumptions behind them. Consider just a few points.

 “NO CREED, BUT...!” Is a Self-Refuting Statement!

A self-refuting or internally incoherent statement is one that contains a self-contradiction. So, whether in theory or practice, the claim that is being made cannot be consistent with itself. For example, “I can’t read English!” If you read that claim out loud, then you were making a self-refuting statement, because you DID read it and it WAS in English! “I never tell the truth” is another example of a self-refuting or internally incoherent statement someone might make. If this claim is true, then you shouldn’t believe it, because the one making it never tells the truth, so it can’t be true. However, if it is untrue, then it is false and still unbelievable. The “NO CREED, BUT...” claims have the same problem; they too are self-refuting. But, how?

The fact is, “No creed but Christ,” is itself a creed!!!

If a creed is defined as (1) a brief authoritative formula of religious belief; or (2) a set of fundamental belief(s), then it is obvious that the “No creed, but...!” is a creed in and of itself. For some, it is the most fundamental doctrine of all.