I call upon You, Lord, God of Abraham and God of Isaac and God of Jacob and Israel, You who are the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, the God who, through the abundance of your mercy, was well-pleased towards us so that we may know You, who made heaven and earth, who rules over all, You who are the one and the true God, above whom there is no other God; You who, by our Lord Jesus Christ gave us the gift of the Holy Spirit, give to every one who reads this writing to know You, that You alone are God, to be strengthened in You, and to avoid every heretical and godless and impious teaching.

St Irenaeus of Lyons, Against the Heresies 3:6:4


Showing posts with label Christian Education. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Christian Education. Show all posts

Thursday, June 5, 2014

William Baer, Nineteen Minutes, and the Needed Exodus



CBS News recently reported on the remarkable arrest of William Baer, the father of a fourteen daughter and student at Gilford High School in Gilford, New Hampshire, whose required reading in an English class included what Baer described as being “like a transcript for a triple-X porno movie.”[1] The controversial reading assignment, which served as the grounds of Baer’s complaint, is Jodi Picoult’s Nineteen Minutes, which includes an explicit, or perhaps better illicit, description of a sexual encounter between two teens as part of the book’s narrative. In addition to his daughter’s personal exposure to the material, Baer complained, “We had no notice of it whatsoever, no written notice, no verbal, nothing.”
Baer took his understandable complaints to a meeting of the Gilford School Board. The meeting policy allocated a mere two minutes per person for public comments. Pressing for answers and a response from school board members, Baer exceeded the two minute limit; he was repeatedly asked to stop talking. Lt. James Leach, Gilford Police Department’s acting chief, approached Baer, who told Leach, “Arrest me or I’m not going to [i.e., stop talking].” Baer continued, and Leach arrested and booked Baer for disorderly conduct, which could result in an additional $1200 fine.
Beyond the prima facie absurdity of the circumstances surrounding Baer’s arrest, and even deeper than the state compulsorily exposing fourteen year olds to pornographic material, which school officials deemed “thought-provoking and appropriate for the ninth graders,” is the heart of the issue—the state’s gross transgression of God’s institution of sphere sovereignty. Ray Sutton explains, “Sphere sovereignty says that there are three spheres of covenantal government in society: Family, Church, and State.”[2] This plurality of authorities is by God’s ordering of society. And such ordering preserves the necessary “checks and balances,” as we say, to prevent the absolutization of any one sphere’s authority over the others and thereby averts tyranny, which is the most constant threat east of Eden. In terms of sphere sovereignty, the only one which possesses it absolutely and universally over all spheres is the Lord God. This is biblical sociology; this is the divine design for society.[3]
While there are obvious overlaps between these spheres, wherein members of one sphere are also members of the others, the sovereignty, that is, authority, of each sphere is self-contained. Each sphere has certain authority and responsibilities which are mutually exclusive of one another.[4] Concerning children, which are members of both the family and the state, by means of their commitment to government schools, the family possesses the exclusive and moral authority in all matters by God’s ordinance. All legitimate school/teacher authority, then, is derivative from the parents, as schools/teachers stand loco parentis, in the place of the parents, not the state.  In fact, “it may be said that the Bible in speaking of the duties of the state never mentions the work of educating the children of the nation (cf. Ex. 18:22—26; Deut. 1:16, 17; Matt. 22:17—21; Rom. 13:1—7; 1 Pet. 2:13—15).”[5] Therefore, as in the considered case, when the state, through any one of its nearly infinite number of agencies, seeks to hyperextend its sovereignty and transgress its proper divinely ordered boundary, it finds itself in an illegitimate struggle against the invaded sphere, the family, for the crown rights and authority over its members, its children. In our context, “Authority has shifted away from the parent to the state.”[6] More than that, the state is found to be at war with Lord of Hosts, the Holy One of Israel, as their breech of boundary is at once a violation of God’s law-ordinance and the futile attempt to usurp God’s absolute authority over all spheres. It is an expression to the original satanic temptation for man to strive to be like God—absolute autonomy—to be a god unto himself (Gen. 3:5).
At stake, then, is the issue of sovereignty and authority, the divine ordering of society and a state attack right at the very heart of all society, the family. Sutton is therefore well-justified in contending, “the government is privately and publically at war with the family...[the family] is being attacked from all sides. The greatest enemy is the government itself.”[7] In the reported story concerning Baer we have a clear case of the state seizing by force (literally) the authority of the family, and this in the area of sexual morality regarding the children. Correctly, then, Sutton highlights that in the state’s war against the family “sex is one of the areas being attacked,” since the family has a fundamental monopoly on this area.      
Baer’s story is simply one example of a powerful and dark force surging through the undercurrent of our culture. It is an illustration of the secular humanist coup, which is using devious litigation and illegitimate state power and control to destroy the remnants of the once profoundly Christian culture and worldview that nurtured American society for centuries. This present-day assault bears the original subtlety of its source, which knew that in order to control the world one must begin with the destruction of the family (Gen. 3; 2 Cor. 11:3; 1 Tim. 2:11—15).    
It must be granted, however, the anonymous CBS reporter that authored the story did a reasonably good job at masking his or her biased bend toward the school board’s decision, actions against Baer, and resulting policy changes. The bias is nevertheless apparent.
The reporting of the story was rather straight forward and seemingly objective. The reporter’s input and details constituted 173 words of the story’s total word count of 306. The school board’s comments were given 43 words; Leach, the arresting officer, was given a mere 30 words, while Baer was allowed 60 words to express his position in the controversy. Granting the allegedly long monologue that Baer gave at the meeting, though, the reader can easily sense that the reporter omitted the crux of Baer’s problems. The bulk of Baer’s account that the reporter included consisted primarily of details surrounding the arrest, which strategically diverts the reader’s attention from the heart of the matter, the state’s tyrannizing of the parents.
Similarly, the reporter shared that the Gilford School Board sent CBS a statement “explaining it has revised its policy for letting parents know about books being read.” With this the reader is postured to hear what so far seems like a reasonable response and redress on the school board’s part. Thus the school board’s statement begins, “The district will take immediate action to revise these policies to include notification...” If honest, the average reader, which would be only skimming the story, would admit that he has already jumped to the next paragraph, believing that the board had made accommodations for parental notification and participation options. The rest of the school board’s statement is, for this writer, more shocking and controversial that the prescribed book that started the struggle.
The statement goes on to say, “...that requires parents to accept controversial material rather than opt out” (!!). So, the school board is taking immediate action to change its notification policies not to allow parents to exercise their God-given authority and prerogative but to notify them that the state has utterly ripped that authority from their hands, leaving them no option but to shut up and obey—its tyranny! If the last several decades have not made the point painfully obvious, Cornelius Van Til announces it for those slow of heart: “If then we want a God-centered and truly Christian education, we will have to break away completely from the education philosophy that surrounds us [i.e., state education].”[8] This radical—fascists—declaration of the Gilford School Board evidences that American Christians are at an inflexible point in their history, which will demand an absolute and exclusive decision: Who will be lord over my family, Christ the Lord or Caesar as lord? Despite how subtly written, the CBS story covering Baer’s situation sends a warning that this decision entails higher stakes with every day that passes.
In a final stroke of propagandizing prowess, the reporter concludes the story with two brief sentences about Baer. Lest the reader walk away from the report confused who the real “bad guy” is in this tale, we are told “Baer was charged with disorderly conduct. If convicted, he could be fined up to $1200.” It is as if the reporter said: Remember all you parents of even marginally traditional families and values, it is a crime against the state to stand on your God-given crown rights over your children’s moral education and sexual purity!
            Christians, who still allow the public education’s statecraft and humanistic religion to indoctrinate their children, are often outraged to learn of the painfully obvious attacks on their family’s values, which are ground into their kids’ minds daily. However, granting how overt and open the enemy is on this front, it reminds me of the idiot that wants to sue R. J. Reynolds for his lung cancer, after a lifetime of smoking no-filter cigarettes; like the lady who screams “Look out!!” after she backs into your car in Walmart’s parking lot! The point? It’s over-time to get our children OUT—it’s time for an exodus!   



Bibliography
Berkhof, Louis and Cornelius Van Til. Foundations of Christian Education: Addresses to Christian Teachers. Phillipsburg, NJ: Presbyterian & Reformed Publishing Company, 1990.

CBS News. “Dad Arrested for Complaining about Girl’s School Assignment.” CBS Interactive Inc. (May 07, 2014). As found at http://www.cbsnews.com/news/dad-arrested-for-complaining-about-daughters-school-assignment/ (accessed May 22, 2014).

Sutton, Ray. Who Owns the Family: God or State? Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, Inc., 1986.



[1] CBS News, “Dad Arrested for Complaining about Girl’s School Assignment,” CBS Interactive Inc. (May 07, 2014), as found at http://www.cbsnews.com/news/dad-arrested-for-complaining-about-daughters-school-assignment/ (accessed May 22, 2014). Unless otherwise noted by citation, all quotes and references to the story is taken from this article.

[2] Ray Sutton, Who Owns the Family: God or State? (Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, Inc., 1986), 20.

[3] Ibid.

[4] Ibid.

[5] Louis Berkhof and Cornelius Van Til, Foundations of Christian Education: Addresses to Christian Teachers (Phillipsburg, NJ: Presbyterian & Reformed Publishing Company, 1990), 29.
[6] Sutton, Who Owns the Family?, 15.

[7] Ibid., xxiii.
[8] Berkhof and Van Til, Foundations of Christian Education, 3.

Saturday, June 29, 2013

The Scots' Confession, Chapter 5

The Continuance, Increase, and Preservation of the Kirk

We most constantly believe that God preserved, instructed, multiplied, honoured, decored, and from death called to life his kirk (i.e., church) in all ages, from Adam, till the coming of Christ Jesus in the flesh.[1] For Abraham he called from his father's country; him he instructed; his seed he multiplied;[2] the same he marvelously preserved, and more marvelously delivered from the bondage and tyranny of Pharaoh;[3] to them he gave his laws, constitutions, and ceremonies;[4] them he possessed in the land of Canaan;[5] to them, after Judges and after Saul, he gave David to be king, to whom he made promise, that of the fruit of his loins should one sit for ever upon his regal seat.[6] To this same people, from time to time, he sent prophets to reduce them to the right way of their God,[7] from the which often times they declined by idolatry. And albeit for their stubborn contempt of justice, he was compelled to give them in the hands of their enemies,[8] as before was threatened by the mouth of Moses,[9] insomuch that the holy city was destroyed, the temple burnt with fire,[10] and the whole land left desolate the space of seventy years;[11] yet of mercy did he reduce them again to Jerusalem, where the city and temple were reedified, and they, against all temptations and assaults of Satan, did abide till the Messiah came, according to the promise.[12] 

1. Ezek. 6:6-14.
2. Gen. 12:1; 13:1.
3. Ex. 1, etc.
4. Josh. 1:3; 23:4.
5. 1 Sam. 10:1; 16:13.
6. 2 Sam. 7:12.
7. 2 Kings 17:13-19.
8. 2 Kings 24:3-4.
9. Deut. 28:36, 48.
10. 2 Kings 25.
11. Dan. 9:2.
12. Jer. 30; Ezra 1, etc.; Hag. 1:14; 2:7-9; Zech. 3:8.

Saturday, April 6, 2013

Doves Going to Nigeria with Rafiki Foundation


For centuries, the faithful Church has prayed,

Almighty God, look mercifully upon the world which thou hast redeemed by the blood of thy dear Son, and incline the hearts of many to dedicate themselves to the sacred Ministry of thy Church; through the same thy Son Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen (Book of Common Prayer 1928).

Ronda and Gehrig DoveInsofar as mission is an integral part of the Church’s ministry to our broken, ignorant, hurting, gospel-needing world, God has given a personal answer to that prayer through two friends of ours.

Our dear brother and sister in Christ, Gehrig and Ronda Dove, have answered the Lord’s call to serve him in Africa through the powerful and faithful ministry of the Rafiki Foundation.  Rafiki is a unique missional organization, which truly seeks to give flesh and bone to St. James’ description of “pure religion,” which is to “visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction” (1:27). 

The mission of the Rafiki Foundation is to help Africans know God by caring for and educating orphans, providing materials and training in education and Bible study, and giving economic opportunities to widows. 

The Doves are currently preparing to leave their home in Lexington, Virginia for Nigeria by April 20, if passports and other logistical needs come through.  I know there is still much demanding their attention on the home front.  So, I would challenge you to support these two in the good work on which they are embarking for Christ’s namesake.  Please pray for them.  You can better know how to pray by reading their current newsletters and adding your name to their newsletter updates through email.  I would also challenge you to consider offering the Doves financial support .  There are a number of uncertainties before the Doves, but one thing is not: they are palpably aware of their utter dependence upon God’s mercy, grace, and blessings for each day and those ahead. 

So, just know, “beloved, it is a faithful thing you do in all your efforts for these brethren, strangers as they are...You will do well to send them on their journey in a manner worthy of God.  For they have gone out for the sake of the name...Therefore we ought to support people like these, that we may be fellow workers for the truth” (3 Jn. 5—8). 

O LORD, our heavenly Father, whose blessed Son came not to be ministered unto, but to minister; We beseech thee to bless all who, following in his steps, give themselves to the service of their fellow men. Endue them with wisdom, patience, and courage to strengthen the weak and raise up those who fall; that, being inspired by thy love, they may worthily minister in thy Name to the suffering, the friendless, and the needy; for the sake of him who laid down his life for us, the same thy Son, our Saviour Jesus Christ. Amen (BCP 1928). 

Tuesday, March 5, 2013

The Consolation of Theology: Or Why We Need Scholar Priests

In my opinion, this is an incredible waste and a disturbingly shortsighted view of priestly ministry. We need priests and pastors with an academic background just as we need academics with the training and experience of priestly ministry. We are off in a dangerous place when we decide that some of those coming forward are too smart to be made priests.
Continue reading Fr. Hendrickson’s on point perspective on the necessary wedding of rigorous scholarship and compassionate pastoral ministry, or academic pastors and pastoral academics, over at The Curate’s Desk.

Monday, February 11, 2013

New Resource for the Bioethics Debate

D. A. Carson: “This Is Now the ‘Must Read’ Book in the Field”

Dr. Carson writes of Dr. Megan Best’s new book, Fearfully and Wonderfully Made: Ethics and the Beginning of Human Life (Matthias Media, 2012): “At last—a single volume examining beginning-of-life issues that is equally competent in biology, theology, philosophy, and pastoral care. This is now the ‘must read’ book in the field, a necessary resource not only for pastors, ethicists, and laypersons who share her Christian convictions, but also for anyone who wants to participate knowledgeably in current bioethical debates.”  Read more...

Sunday, January 27, 2013

The Hype Against Homeschooling


We often heard—and still hear as former homeschoolers—that by isolating our daughter from the swim of her cohort within the context of the public school system, we were depriving her of the necessary conditions of social maturation and normalcy.  If children are to properly mature and grow into balanced, healthy adults, ready for the so-called “real world,” then they must, above all, experience the allegedly normalizing potion called public school. 

It is safe in the nurturing womb of this venerated social institution that children have their hearts and minds cultivated.  In the bosom of the State, the children have their intellectual, psychological, moral, and spiritual lives fed by the pap of Caesar.  Or so the rhetoric goes.

So insidious is this faulty line of nonsense that, when we returned home to Kansas for the first time, after having been in Virginia a couple of years, some of our closest family made remarks about how “normal” Israel was—despite being homeschooled those two years.  In one subtle form or another, with the exception of this last time—after Israel had graduated high school a year early—it happened every visit thereafter. 

In October of last year, I had a close cousin take me aside at a family shindig, and with as much sincerity as I’ve ever seen in him, he said, “If I am able to raise my two girls into half the young lady that Beaner (i.e., Israel) is, then I’ll feel like I did a darn good job.”  What a humbling statement!  This was obviously a lovely thing to hear, especially from one of our family, since ours is completely unafraid of being obnoxiously honest with each other. 

Of course, Israel is what she is by the grace of God, and I shared that with Nathan my complimentary cousin.  The truth of the matter is, however, that education in the context of the covenant family is a very important means of grace for raising godly offspring.  So, we believe that in good measure Israel’s well-developed character and personality, her gracious heart, and her biblical view of life and the world grew largely out of, not in spite of, her homeschool experience. 

What of this de facto assumption that public education is the formula for augmenting a child’s maturity and normalcy, and preparing them for the so-called “real world”?   What is interesting is that it is the nearly unsupervised co-mingling of children within the context of their cohort, with all its attending allurements and temptations, which cause many youth to mature far beyond what their emotions, minds, and even bodies are prepared or designed to handle.   

Ironically, juvenile justice scholars decry this aspect of the youth culture, accrediting it to be a primary contributor to juvenile delinquency.  As a result of the accelerated maturation, caused by the public school environment, “many suffer from health problems, are underachievers in school, and are skeptical about their ability to enter the workforce and become productive members of society.”[1]  The other irony is that public educators propose themselves and their institution to either be or have the solution to the youth crisis—it's priest craft. 

So, the duped populace will tell you that, if you homeschool your child, then it will result hampering her proper levels of maturation and social normalcy.  However, it is the public school context that cultures the very pre-maturation and pscyho-social problems that are so-called “normal” today, and often lead to a life of delinquency.  Therefore, the concern expressed by unwitting family and friends, interpreted in terms of the facts, actually says: If you homeschool, your child will be more likely to avoid the unhealthy and ungodly influences that lead to an unproductive outlook or problems of a worse nature.  And this, dear friends, is hardly a sound argument against homeschooling; rather, it's one for it.

Finally, what is the “real world” after all?  In this conversation, “real world” is a loaded term.  Most who make this suggestion haven’t really carefully thought through what they are saying.  They usually don’t even have any meaningful content to share, if you ask them what exactly they mean by “real world.”  That has been my experience at any rate.  The unspoken meaning, however, connoted the very crises that are being decried by the so-called experts.  Facing bullying, “Just Say(ing) No” to the manifold pressures to participate in drug and alcohol use, sexual temptations or harassments, learning how to sit quietly under an arbitrary authority, learning how to keep your mouth shut, while a supposed authority figure contradicts every meaningful conviction, belief, and value of your personal perspective, and other such madness.  This is what is meant by “real world,” in the mind of the objector. 

Do you see the underlying premise?  The underlying premise is that the public school is primarily designed for socialization not education.  No one is so stupid as to try to argue that public education better equips the student’s mind and intellectual development over homeschooling—the data against such nonsense is overwhelming.  No; rather, public school is an institution for social engineering, to develop not careful, critical thinkers, who can reason on their own but good little boys and girls, who can perpetuate the myths of naturalistic, secular humanism.  State schools are not academic but religious institutions, and the loaded definition of “real world” is simply the humanists’ historical narrative; the “real world” is just their narration of the world. 

After years in the dog business, literally every aspect of it, I’ve seen so many folks drop their dog of to be boarded for the weekend or longer, weeping, so anxious to hear the promise that little Princess will receive the best care available, that she be protected from all the other dogs in the kennel, and that she receive her mile walk each day, and blah, blah, blah.  Sadly, though, how many Christians send their kids off to a public school, often not even knowing the name of the teacher(s), his religion, sexual orientation, background, worldview, politics, ethics, etc.?  What is wrong with this picture?  The oft quoted Proverb goes, “Train up a child in the way he should go; even when he is old he will not depart from it” (22:6).  It should be no surprise that eighty to ninety percent of Christian children wash their hands of the Church and the Faith before the end of their freshman year of college.   
    
  


[1] Siegel, L. J., and B. C. Welsh, Juvenile Delinquency: The Core, 4th ed. (Mason, OH: Cengage Learning), 3.