I call upon You, Lord, God of Abraham and God of Isaac and God of Jacob and Israel, You who are the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, the God who, through the abundance of your mercy, was well-pleased towards us so that we may know You, who made heaven and earth, who rules over all, You who are the one and the true God, above whom there is no other God; You who, by our Lord Jesus Christ gave us the gift of the Holy Spirit, give to every one who reads this writing to know You, that You alone are God, to be strengthened in You, and to avoid every heretical and godless and impious teaching.

St Irenaeus of Lyons, Against the Heresies 3:6:4


Showing posts with label Christian youth. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Christian youth. Show all posts

Thursday, June 5, 2014

William Baer, Nineteen Minutes, and the Needed Exodus



CBS News recently reported on the remarkable arrest of William Baer, the father of a fourteen daughter and student at Gilford High School in Gilford, New Hampshire, whose required reading in an English class included what Baer described as being “like a transcript for a triple-X porno movie.”[1] The controversial reading assignment, which served as the grounds of Baer’s complaint, is Jodi Picoult’s Nineteen Minutes, which includes an explicit, or perhaps better illicit, description of a sexual encounter between two teens as part of the book’s narrative. In addition to his daughter’s personal exposure to the material, Baer complained, “We had no notice of it whatsoever, no written notice, no verbal, nothing.”
Baer took his understandable complaints to a meeting of the Gilford School Board. The meeting policy allocated a mere two minutes per person for public comments. Pressing for answers and a response from school board members, Baer exceeded the two minute limit; he was repeatedly asked to stop talking. Lt. James Leach, Gilford Police Department’s acting chief, approached Baer, who told Leach, “Arrest me or I’m not going to [i.e., stop talking].” Baer continued, and Leach arrested and booked Baer for disorderly conduct, which could result in an additional $1200 fine.
Beyond the prima facie absurdity of the circumstances surrounding Baer’s arrest, and even deeper than the state compulsorily exposing fourteen year olds to pornographic material, which school officials deemed “thought-provoking and appropriate for the ninth graders,” is the heart of the issue—the state’s gross transgression of God’s institution of sphere sovereignty. Ray Sutton explains, “Sphere sovereignty says that there are three spheres of covenantal government in society: Family, Church, and State.”[2] This plurality of authorities is by God’s ordering of society. And such ordering preserves the necessary “checks and balances,” as we say, to prevent the absolutization of any one sphere’s authority over the others and thereby averts tyranny, which is the most constant threat east of Eden. In terms of sphere sovereignty, the only one which possesses it absolutely and universally over all spheres is the Lord God. This is biblical sociology; this is the divine design for society.[3]
While there are obvious overlaps between these spheres, wherein members of one sphere are also members of the others, the sovereignty, that is, authority, of each sphere is self-contained. Each sphere has certain authority and responsibilities which are mutually exclusive of one another.[4] Concerning children, which are members of both the family and the state, by means of their commitment to government schools, the family possesses the exclusive and moral authority in all matters by God’s ordinance. All legitimate school/teacher authority, then, is derivative from the parents, as schools/teachers stand loco parentis, in the place of the parents, not the state.  In fact, “it may be said that the Bible in speaking of the duties of the state never mentions the work of educating the children of the nation (cf. Ex. 18:22—26; Deut. 1:16, 17; Matt. 22:17—21; Rom. 13:1—7; 1 Pet. 2:13—15).”[5] Therefore, as in the considered case, when the state, through any one of its nearly infinite number of agencies, seeks to hyperextend its sovereignty and transgress its proper divinely ordered boundary, it finds itself in an illegitimate struggle against the invaded sphere, the family, for the crown rights and authority over its members, its children. In our context, “Authority has shifted away from the parent to the state.”[6] More than that, the state is found to be at war with Lord of Hosts, the Holy One of Israel, as their breech of boundary is at once a violation of God’s law-ordinance and the futile attempt to usurp God’s absolute authority over all spheres. It is an expression to the original satanic temptation for man to strive to be like God—absolute autonomy—to be a god unto himself (Gen. 3:5).
At stake, then, is the issue of sovereignty and authority, the divine ordering of society and a state attack right at the very heart of all society, the family. Sutton is therefore well-justified in contending, “the government is privately and publically at war with the family...[the family] is being attacked from all sides. The greatest enemy is the government itself.”[7] In the reported story concerning Baer we have a clear case of the state seizing by force (literally) the authority of the family, and this in the area of sexual morality regarding the children. Correctly, then, Sutton highlights that in the state’s war against the family “sex is one of the areas being attacked,” since the family has a fundamental monopoly on this area.      
Baer’s story is simply one example of a powerful and dark force surging through the undercurrent of our culture. It is an illustration of the secular humanist coup, which is using devious litigation and illegitimate state power and control to destroy the remnants of the once profoundly Christian culture and worldview that nurtured American society for centuries. This present-day assault bears the original subtlety of its source, which knew that in order to control the world one must begin with the destruction of the family (Gen. 3; 2 Cor. 11:3; 1 Tim. 2:11—15).    
It must be granted, however, the anonymous CBS reporter that authored the story did a reasonably good job at masking his or her biased bend toward the school board’s decision, actions against Baer, and resulting policy changes. The bias is nevertheless apparent.
The reporting of the story was rather straight forward and seemingly objective. The reporter’s input and details constituted 173 words of the story’s total word count of 306. The school board’s comments were given 43 words; Leach, the arresting officer, was given a mere 30 words, while Baer was allowed 60 words to express his position in the controversy. Granting the allegedly long monologue that Baer gave at the meeting, though, the reader can easily sense that the reporter omitted the crux of Baer’s problems. The bulk of Baer’s account that the reporter included consisted primarily of details surrounding the arrest, which strategically diverts the reader’s attention from the heart of the matter, the state’s tyrannizing of the parents.
Similarly, the reporter shared that the Gilford School Board sent CBS a statement “explaining it has revised its policy for letting parents know about books being read.” With this the reader is postured to hear what so far seems like a reasonable response and redress on the school board’s part. Thus the school board’s statement begins, “The district will take immediate action to revise these policies to include notification...” If honest, the average reader, which would be only skimming the story, would admit that he has already jumped to the next paragraph, believing that the board had made accommodations for parental notification and participation options. The rest of the school board’s statement is, for this writer, more shocking and controversial that the prescribed book that started the struggle.
The statement goes on to say, “...that requires parents to accept controversial material rather than opt out” (!!). So, the school board is taking immediate action to change its notification policies not to allow parents to exercise their God-given authority and prerogative but to notify them that the state has utterly ripped that authority from their hands, leaving them no option but to shut up and obey—its tyranny! If the last several decades have not made the point painfully obvious, Cornelius Van Til announces it for those slow of heart: “If then we want a God-centered and truly Christian education, we will have to break away completely from the education philosophy that surrounds us [i.e., state education].”[8] This radical—fascists—declaration of the Gilford School Board evidences that American Christians are at an inflexible point in their history, which will demand an absolute and exclusive decision: Who will be lord over my family, Christ the Lord or Caesar as lord? Despite how subtly written, the CBS story covering Baer’s situation sends a warning that this decision entails higher stakes with every day that passes.
In a final stroke of propagandizing prowess, the reporter concludes the story with two brief sentences about Baer. Lest the reader walk away from the report confused who the real “bad guy” is in this tale, we are told “Baer was charged with disorderly conduct. If convicted, he could be fined up to $1200.” It is as if the reporter said: Remember all you parents of even marginally traditional families and values, it is a crime against the state to stand on your God-given crown rights over your children’s moral education and sexual purity!
            Christians, who still allow the public education’s statecraft and humanistic religion to indoctrinate their children, are often outraged to learn of the painfully obvious attacks on their family’s values, which are ground into their kids’ minds daily. However, granting how overt and open the enemy is on this front, it reminds me of the idiot that wants to sue R. J. Reynolds for his lung cancer, after a lifetime of smoking no-filter cigarettes; like the lady who screams “Look out!!” after she backs into your car in Walmart’s parking lot! The point? It’s over-time to get our children OUT—it’s time for an exodus!   



Bibliography
Berkhof, Louis and Cornelius Van Til. Foundations of Christian Education: Addresses to Christian Teachers. Phillipsburg, NJ: Presbyterian & Reformed Publishing Company, 1990.

CBS News. “Dad Arrested for Complaining about Girl’s School Assignment.” CBS Interactive Inc. (May 07, 2014). As found at http://www.cbsnews.com/news/dad-arrested-for-complaining-about-daughters-school-assignment/ (accessed May 22, 2014).

Sutton, Ray. Who Owns the Family: God or State? Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, Inc., 1986.



[1] CBS News, “Dad Arrested for Complaining about Girl’s School Assignment,” CBS Interactive Inc. (May 07, 2014), as found at http://www.cbsnews.com/news/dad-arrested-for-complaining-about-daughters-school-assignment/ (accessed May 22, 2014). Unless otherwise noted by citation, all quotes and references to the story is taken from this article.

[2] Ray Sutton, Who Owns the Family: God or State? (Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, Inc., 1986), 20.

[3] Ibid.

[4] Ibid.

[5] Louis Berkhof and Cornelius Van Til, Foundations of Christian Education: Addresses to Christian Teachers (Phillipsburg, NJ: Presbyterian & Reformed Publishing Company, 1990), 29.
[6] Sutton, Who Owns the Family?, 15.

[7] Ibid., xxiii.
[8] Berkhof and Van Til, Foundations of Christian Education, 3.

Wednesday, August 1, 2012

TODAY'S CHURCH AND CULTURE: The Need to Go Back to the Future


The past helps us to understand not only why our culture is where it is today but also how it got where it is.  I believe the undeniable shift from modernism to postmodernism is under-appreciated in the church at large, and is certainly under-applied in her strategy for reaching this generation.  Moreover, I would argue that the church should be neither modernist (which it sadly has) nor postmodern (which it often tries hard to be).  Rather, we should be true and faithful to our roots, which can be called paleo-orthodoxy.[1] 

Predictably, modernism, which attempted to dethrone God and setup man and human reason as the ultimate authority in every sphere, utterly failed to flesh out its lofty promises of progress, peace, and prosperity.  It was thought that, if the Enlightenment principles of human autonomy were rigorously applied, ignorance, hatred, war, and the whole host of other social ills would be eliminated.  Through rationalism and science, moreover, humanity could engineer its own evolutionary progress at a light speed pace, finally reaching a utopian-like society.  What, however, did these utopian dreams deliver us?  The climax of modernism—the 19th and 20th centuries—gave us two world wars and the bloodiest century in history.  More people were murdered through war, apartheid, and genocide during the 20th century than in all previously recorded history!  Or, as T. S. Eliot despaired the situation in elevated verse:

            Where is the Life we have lost in living?
            Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge?
            Where is the knowledge we have lost in information?
            The cycles of Heaven in twenty centuries
            Bring us further from GOD and nearer to the Dust.[2]

Sadly, the church largely tried to fight the modernist dogma with modernistic weapons.  Systematic theologians were rigorously rationalistic.  Apologetics were also markedly rationalistic, attempting to satisfy the critera of the Foundationalists.  The Bible was wrenched to appease the ever-changing and ever-increasing scientific theories that, in principle, were (and are) perfectly incompatible with the Faith’s most basic presuppositions.  Evangelism and church-growth became highly methodological (epistemological methodism being a badge of modernism).  Thus, the church was plagued with the problem of understanding her convictions in terms of the spirit of the age, modernism.  Amid this morass, however, there were near prophetic voices, which sought to rescue the church from her modernistic Babylonian captivity.  Rather than struggling to couch the Faith in modernists’ term, Abraham Kuyper, for example, sought to confront modernism and its ecclesiastic hegemony.  Regarding the modernist challenge, Kuyper prescribes the following.

Do not forget that the fundamental contrast has been, is still, and will be until the end: Christianity and Paganism, the idols or the living God…Accordingly, radical determination must be insisted upon.  Half-measure cannot guarantee the desired result.  Superficiality will not brace us for the conflict.  Principle must again bear witness against principle, world-view against world-view, spirit against spirit.[3]

With nearly the vigor and candor of an Old Testament prophet, Kuyper, and those in his train of tradition (e.g., Herman Dooyewerd, Cornelius Van Til, Francis Schaeffer, et al.), have preempted the postmodern challenge by prescribing the strategy for the battle against modernism.  However, is postmodernism any friendlier to the Faith than modernism has historically been?  I think, no.

Regarding the reality of postmodernism, Don Carson is spot on.  “Postmodernism gently applied rightly questions the arrogance of modernism; postmodernism ruthlessly applied nurtures a new hubris and deifies agnosticism.”[4]  Whereas the modernist purist deified reason (especially explicit during the French Revolution!) through rationalism, postmodernism deifies agnosticism, resulting in irrationalism.  Postmodernism says that no one can know anything absolutely, and of that fact we are absolutely sure!  Thus, the foundational shift from modernism to postmodernism is largely a radical shift—in fact a polarity—in epistemology.  Modernism reached for divine, comprehensive, absolute knowledge predicated on human reason alone, which is idolatry; postmodernism, on the contrary, revels in universal agnosticism, ignorance being the only virtue left, which is no less arrogant and no less idolatrous.  Both perspectives definitively hold that God is not there, and he has not spoken.

Therefore, if we have learned anything from the past it is that the church should not accommodate a compromise with the prevailing spirit of the age, as it did with modernism.  This generation (i.e., “the Bridgers”; the born and bred postmoderns) are caught in a dialectical tension, concerning their view of the church: it is either “reactionary” or “redefining.”  Of course, there are those in the middle.  However, it is the polarities that usually shape the future.  So, to these we must pay close attention. 

The “reactionaries” tend toward traditionalism, whereas the “redefinitionals” are opting for the so-called Emergent movement within certain circles.[5] What I see happening within the Emergent movement is simply the same errors committed by the modernist church of the past century.  If the church in the past was guilty for their compromise with the spirit modernism, then the Emergent is equally guilty of incarnating the spirit of postmodernism.  Both have been unfaithful in presenting their respective generations with an authentic alternative to the prevailing worldly-worldview.  If the modernist church was guilty of making man more than he is, then the postmodern Emergent is guilty of making God much less than he is.  Either way, the sin of idolatry crouches at the door, and as always, its desire is for us!

I believe, therefore, if we wish to be faithful to our sovereign Lord Jesus, and to this generation, we must skew both the modernist and the postmodernist perspective and return to a paleo-orthodoxy.  For me, paleo-orthodoxy contextualizes the enduring gospel and the creedo-confessional faith.  It is traditional in one sense.  We are absolutists in presuppositions that transcend the modernist-postmodernist shift.  We can know absolute truth, for instance, not because man is so great (i.e., modernism), but because God is so good, in that he has condescended in revealing Truth, in nature, in history, in Scripture, and supremely in his Son (see e.g., Ps. 19; Jn. 1:1—18; Heb. 1:1—3).  Nevertheless, paleo-orthodoxy confesses that man is also largely ignorant, not because he is alone in the universe, leaving us with wash-up epistemological relativism (i.e., postmodernism), but precisely because he is finite and fallen, and is therefore utterly dependent on God for any knowledge rightly called so.  Presenting a paleo-orthodoxy to this generation offers an authenticity and transparency that our youth need to see today; it is epistemologically humble, but doesn’t revel in ignorance; it presents a holistic message of salvation to a confused and ideologically tossed generation, extending a solid Rock on which to stand in this age, and on which to hope for the age to come.  Paleo-orthodoxy invites this generation of young people to understand their life-story in terms of God’s people, the Church, and his creation-redemptive story, which has always confessed through the faddish ages,

            We believe in God the Father Almighty,
            The maker of heaven and earth,
            And in Jesus Christ, his only Son, our Lord,
            Who was conceived by the Holy Ghost,
            Born of the virgin Mary,
            Suffered under Pontius Pilate,
            Was crucified, dead, and buried,
            The third day he arose again from the dead,
            And now sitteth on the right hand of God the Father Almighty,
            From thence, he shall come to judge the quick and the dead.

            We believe in the Holy Ghost,
            The holy catholic Church,
            The communion of the saints,
            The forgiveness of sins,
            The resurrection of the body,
            And the life everlasting.  Amen!  

If we are to reach our youth and make a lasting change and reversal in this culture, we must be honest and authentic; we must resist fads, appealing to every whim of the student’s culture in the name of contextualization, and present something altogether different—something as different as light is from darkness, as the temple of God is from idols, as Christ is from Belail.  We must not yoke the Faith with the prevailing spirit of infidelity, whether that be modernist or postmodernist (2 Cor. 6:14—16).  We must faithfully proclaim that what is real, right, rational, and remedial for mankind is either the Faith that is built upon the sure Rock, or it is a false-faith built on the shifting, sinking sands of the prevailing culture (Matt. 7:24—27).  As throughout history, it is only this conviction, the biblical presupposition of the revelation of God in Christ to all ages that affords the Church today with a foundation that will support the radical influx of young people who would, by grace alone, heed such a high calling! 

Paleo-orthodoxy begins where the earliest catechesis begins, the Didache.  “There are two ways: one of life and one of death!  And there is a great difference between the two ways” (1:1).[6]  Both the modernist church and the so-called Emergent postmodernist church have utterly failed to press this age-old antithesis between Light and Darkness.  If we are to reach into the life and soul of this generation, we must not!


[1] A term coined, to my best knowledge, by Thomas Oden, the sharpest systematician of the Methodist tradition.

[2] T. S. Eliot, “The Rock,” in The Complete Poems and Plays, (New York, NY: Harcourt Brace and Company, 1980), 24—25.
[3] Abraham Kuyper, Christianity: a Total World and Life System, (Marborough, NH: The Plymouth Rock Foundation, 1996), 120, 121.

[4] D. A. Carson, The Gagging of God: Christianity Confronts Pluralism, (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1996), 544.

[5]We should be careful with these categories, however.  A close look at the Emergent movement proves it to be more reactionary than the so-called reactionaries tending toward traditionalism.  
[6] Aaron Milavec, The Didache: Text, translation, and Commentary, (Collegeville, MN: Litergical Press, 2003), 3. (The Didache is a first century catechesis, likely rooted in the Hebraic-Christian context.)

Tuesday, January 12, 2010

The Bible: America's favorite unopened text!

David R. Nienhuis has written an intriguing piece for Modern Reformation on the state of biblical illiteracy our country, particularly with youth. Well worth the read. Check it out here.